Thread: Wtf

Originally Posted by gadgetman

The difference between a legal system and a justice system. It does have a valid foundation though. Just because someone did it last time doesn't mean they did it this time. It must be proven that in the present situation they did it. Their history is meant to be taken into consideration for any punishment if found guilty of the latest transgression.

Trouble with jurisprudence is it does, with bad decision on top of bad decision, seem to eventuate in

You don't know many arseholes GM or leopards

Originally Posted by ebf

Well, since we've managed to turn what started as an emotional and moral debate into a legal one, here's a legal question.

If a person has had a FAL revoked, are they still able to handle a firearm under the close supervision of a FAL holder ?

Does the pope wear a funny hat?

Originally Posted by Nathan F

Ummm ok. Ive read processed and understood your agument which has lead me to the conclusion that you are still a cock with an intellectual superiority complex!

In your world Nathan, there must be a lot of us around....

Whoa bugger me this thread is charged with emotion. See what happens when you don't hang guilty pricks!

Originally Posted by Rushy

Whoa bugger me this thread is charged with emotion. See what happens when you don't hang guilty pricks!

I'll fu#king deal with you next weekend, how's the food looking?

Originally Posted by Maca49

I'll fu#king deal with you next weekend, how's the food looking?

Good for a Happy and I.

Are you and Happy top and tailing?

Originally Posted by Maca49

Are you and Happy top and tailing?

Not for all the tea in China Maca. I would have thought Happy would be bringing his little 30 cal cuddle buddy.

Originally Posted by 308

Actually looking at Dummer's reputation and behaviour it's possible that he's had a head injury at some point in which case he is not a fit and proper person

Rubbish, and that is as polite as I'm going to get.

Originally Posted by Rushy

Not for all the tea in China Maca. I would have thought Happy would be bringing his little 30 cal cuddle buddy.

Only a 30 cal?

Originally Posted by Sidney

C'mon Thar.. thats a little patronising. I am not your student. Nor am I some 20 something with more conviction than understanding.

Perhaps you would like to identify empathy or emotional understanding in what is already written as above? Sympathy for the victims for their loss is an absolute given.

But I'm actually not convinced that encouraging people to think that its OK to feel aggrieved about someone resuming hunting after such an event, is in fact much different than allowing people to not ban firearms for the same reason.

In fact you could well argue, that the intentional use of firearms is far more traumatic and provides far stronger argument for banning such, but we don't accept that sort of discussion or emotional response as being appropriate either. Nor do we prevent drunk drivers returning to the road, careless drivers or dangerous drivers .. unless they are likely to have continuing issues for other peoples safety.

That is the qualification, your knowledge of this man might indicate that is more likely, and that needs to be assessed and I have no issue with that. Your posts were very sane but some of the following were not.

Yeah, it could have read as being patronizing. I actually thought I was being as funny as hell. A nice example of the difference between intention and impact. I need to up my EQ

The absence of tone and visual cues is a bitch...

It's the far cues that are a prob!

i hope he dosent get his licence, that shooting was in the areas near where i hunt, i sure dont want him anywhere near there while im out there

Shit, sorry Mr Mod, He's obviously a great guy who wouldn't lie to a grieving mother

Yeah, a real prince

Originally Posted by jakewire

Rubbish, and that is as polite as I'm going to get.