I use an ecollar and think they're a great tool for a dog that wont answer a command -my dog is well trained but wont always answer lke a robot so get a vibration o a low level zap.
Tweed or not to Tweed that is the question
the thing with training is there are different methods that suit different people and some work better than others for different people and dogs -dogs certainly have their own personalities as do humans .To out rightly knock using Ecollars as a solid training advice would be very ignorant I believe as do thousands of trainers that have had success.Obviously different arguments can proceed from here for example -if your dog doesn't have the Ecollar on then will he not obey - probably will and maybe not as much as if he did depending on excitement factor of his surroundings .
I would prefer the no Ecollar method but don't have 24/7 to train a dog to the level I want .If you train without one will your dog be better than one trian with a collar ---64000$ question and unless you can put up in a hunting or trial format to show that winning training it all just semantics.
Now in saying all of this I would not be adverse to listening to Ruff about his methods as it is what he does day in day out and not to "consider" his opinion would also be folly
Tweed or not to Tweed that is the question
Tussock, I do not agree with you about Cesear Millan. However, I do think you are on the same track as Ruff (who I am very interested in, but unfortunately getting roared such as like your example, makes me want to not read further)
Cesear is a bit over the top and forgive me if I am wrong Ruff, but he's what you're talking about with the quick-fix, yes? He's quite a flashy, step-in handler who at the end of the 60min program has this 'perfect' dog. I quickly stopped reading the thread where I included a video of Ceasar getting bitten, so I am not entirely sure on Ruff's opinion of him.
Anyway all I can say is that when I first was interested in dog training (around age 10) I thought Ceasar was amazeballs. Since finding more information, I don't feel quite the samewhich is fine! It's called learning and growing up and forming an opinion.
I know I am going to get shot down and growled at for this, but here's my 24months baby experience of +R training answer to the 'ignoring bad behaviour' question.
+ Positive. Meaning, something added.
- Negative. Meaning, something taken away.
P Punishment. Something that happens to discourage behaviour being repeted
R Reinforcement. Something that happens to encourage behaviour being repeted.
+R mark and reward for sitting during a greeting. 'Reward' can be food, toy, patting, attention.
-P turn away when dog is jumping up during a greeting. Leave the room. Remove rewarding stimulous.
+P Pinch dogs ear when jumping up during a greeting.
-R Stop pinching when not jumping up.
-------
+R Give discounted rates to people who pay their phone bill ontime.
-P Remove discounts to late payers. Block phone usage. Block future use of that company.
+P Employ door knockers to continually bash on the door and house of those who have not paid, starting from the moment their bill was due. Bashing has to be so loud that phone cannot be used well (can't hear)
-R Once customer has paid, stop the noise.
Okay that last one was really hard to come up with, but I hope I have given good enough examples
EDIT as I am sure everyone knows by now, I only have experience/research on domestic, family dogs. I don't do hunting dogs. Also this thread was started by me and it was to give people an insight on +R training not just at home but also with working dogs. With over 2000 members is it? I am sure the majority of dog owners on this forum actually own 'pot-lickers' (such as my own dog) and not working or hunting dogs. Phew. Does that cover me for not getting sued?![]()
She loves the free fresh wind in her hair; Life without care. She's broke but it's oke; that's why the lady is a tramp.
Rule 4: Identify your target beyond all doubt
One needs to pick apart training and the actions of a dog that you want to train --what are we really talking about here ?? What is happening in the training and how are you training for these action -whats going wrong and what are you doing to correct those actions .
All the talk of training is just blah blah to a degree -what are we talking about???
Tweed or not to Tweed that is the question
What Tussock said. I like it. I think that is what Ruff is trying to say too.
The Huntaway thing - I am a believer that this trait has been bread into them and they will do it at some point no matter what. I have many friends with Huntaways (as pets) and they expect no barking, unless given a time. And they are given plenty of times to go nuts, bark, be a dog, be a Huntaway. At home and when company is around, that is not the time to be a barking crazy dog. When asked ("voice!" or "are you talking?" etc etc) they are rewarded for the barking and growling, howling, doing their thing.
She loves the free fresh wind in her hair; Life without care. She's broke but it's oke; that's why the lady is a tramp.
Rule 4: Identify your target beyond all doubt
I just read an interesting book called "How to fix a dog gone wrong" by Pemela Dennison, I enjoyed it. It was my first experience looking into the causes and how to manage aggression.
She loves the free fresh wind in her hair; Life without care. She's broke but it's oke; that's why the lady is a tramp.
Rule 4: Identify your target beyond all doubt
? I don't understand if this is a joke or what?
Tussock - sounds like your pup is a pretty cool wee character. Dundee has a huntaway x Lab, he's a tall boy, super fast runner too! Bigger boof head than a pure lab. Cool guy. Did you like the look of the labs in the article (first post)? They have rather sweet faces. I'm not a huge lab person but slowly being converted....Scribe's dog was great, it was good to see a lab in action and not just under a dinner table cleaning up all the scraps!![]()
She loves the free fresh wind in her hair; Life without care. She's broke but it's oke; that's why the lady is a tramp.
Rule 4: Identify your target beyond all doubt
Thanks Tussock, that makes sense, and was even done without growling
What I was trying to get at previously is asking if it is much harder training a single dog vs training a young dog where he/she sees how other dogs are behaving (well). In a pack (dogs, baboons, whatever) is it only the alpha that maintains discipline, or is it not also some of the other dogs "leading" by example ?
And sure, we humans don't necessarily get/understand dog/pack behavior. Pretty much the same can be said for some of these doggy debates where a couple of folks don't seem to realize that a debate/questions about training is not an alpha contest![]()
![]()
Tussock has made a lot of sense. and I'll leave it with him as he articulates it better. You'll find most good dog handlers are very black and white people and so say things extremely directly... that's all I'm doing, I'm not being aggressive i am being forthright. In the dog world things either work or they don't and people seem to take my forthright approach as aggressive, it isn't. Simply there are facts and there are untruths... people will make a great case for things that don;t work... here is an example...
A dog won't respond like a robot as it is a living creature. It should, however, if "well trained" respond. It cannot be well trained and not respond, if it doesn't respond it isn't well enough trained or requires more or more skilled training. The collar is used at the point where the know how ran out.
but this is presented almost like the disobedience is something to value because the dog isn't a robot..... it's that sort of thing that just stops people learning further because they have convinced themselves to accept such a low standard.
A dog won't respond like a robot as it is a living creature. It should, however, if "well trained" respond. It cannot be well trained and not respond, if it doesn't respond it isn't well enough trained or requires more or more skilled training. The collar is used at the point where the know how ran out.
but this is presented almost like the disobedience is something to value because the dog isn't a robot..... it's that sort of thing that just stops people learning further because they have convinced themselves to accept such a low standard.[/QUOTE]
Im afraid this is simply not true Ruff of hunting dogs I have seen that are trained to hunt at a high level -not one has a clean slate and to imply that a highly trained dog will always answer just isnt correct!!!
I like your work though Ruff and people should listen to your advice as it is good
Tweed or not to Tweed that is the question
I agree you may not have seen it... I reiterate it is 100% correct. I go back to my comments about works and what doesn't and also the standards people accept not knowing there is a better standard that is very achievable. If the dog is properly trained to respond, it responds, if it doesn;t respond then the training has not been up to standard... otherwise... what is training achieving....????
Bookmarks