Don't be offended @Beavis, it's just that most people without their B endorsement plan on buying Glocks and Deagles. Not, surprisingly well made, pistols like Norinco's that probably cost more to import than buying locally the pistol they're a copy of
That's fine, I struggle to get excited about 3 gun, for whatever reason. Not that I'd shoot it with an antique pistol anyway.
Is recreational shooting frowned on or something? Like just turning up on a non competition day and smashing rounds out at steel plates for your own amusement and practice? Also I don't really see how using an "orphan" pistol would be much of an issue for Service matches, you only need 6 rounds in two mags.
Clubs differ
We shoot with a practice area most Sundays so everyone can do their own thing
I think that the idea is to *NOT* make all other disciplines think that pistol shooters are wankers and so far this thread and particularly one git's contributions seem to be running the other way
I like shooting and having fun
Do you mean "IPSC" shooters being thought of as wankers, instead of pistol shooters in general?
Our club also has no problem with recreational shooters coming to put rounds into steels on a Sunday, but we do find that, aside from 1-2 mainly BP guys that turn up very regularly, guys that don't fall into a competetive discipline gradually lose interest. We're now in a difficult position due to a small group that may just turn up to a club shoot to sign the log book and leave. I guess some people enjoy the ownership of a pistol more than the act of using it.
Luckily there are plenty of other disciplines that are competetive but don't require such competitive gear. You could happily shoot speed steel with a p38 or tt33
No it is not. But just owning a pistol for the sake of owning one is/should not get anyone a B endorsement.
You have to be a member of a club to hold a B. (C endorsement is a different story.)
People that just want to own a pistol or shoot shit do not generally prove to be valuable club members in my experience. Why should a club endorse you in that instance?
They rarely contribute to anything the club does coz they think the competitive members are wanky. (Yet without them they wouldnt have a B in the first place.)
In some cases they have appalling safety habits, potentially putting the club as an entity at risk because they have not attended any club matches or range days where some supervision under a skilled RO would be of benefit.
So imho, unless you have an interest in a certain discipline and willing to contribute to the club that has to support your B endorsement (you don't have to compete higher than club level)
A person should not be given their B.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.
I agree, but it's the last point that gets me.
We have people in our club, that don't want to do national comps etc., but enjoy coming down on a Saturday and shooting. In my case, they are also the people that do most of the work for the club (working bees, ro, holster certifiers etc....). Maybe in the past they have been competitive on a bigger stage, but now just like the club environment. Or like me, I don't care about grading etc, but do enjoy shooting and the club comradery.
Certainly agree with you on people that just want to own pistols and not be a part of a club ethos, don't do anything for a club/range, etc, they shouldn't have a b.
And as for beavis, good luck and if your in the South island, give me a heads up, and come and have a shot with us.
Please excuse spelling, as finger speed is sometimes behind brain spped........ Or maybe the other wayy.....
Back on track, my B came through this morning, yippee!!
Bookmarks